.Craig Wright, self-declared innovator of Bitcoin, gets to government courthouse in West Hand Seaside, Florida, U.S., on Friday, June 28, 2019. Saul Martinez|Bloomberg|Getty ImagesLONDON u00e2 $" Craig Wright, an Australian male that asserted to become the innovator of bitcoin, was on Tuesday referred to English prosecutors for committing affirmed perjury.On Tuesday, British High Court Court James Mellor determined to refer a case versus Wright's case to become the founder of bitcoin to royalty Prosecution Company u00e2 $" which is the company that prosecutes criminal claims looked into due to the authorities in England and Wales.The CPS will definitely now take into consideration whether Wright should be put on trial of what Mellor called "wholescale perjury and also forgery of documents," as well as pick whether a warrant for detention as well as possible extradition is actually needed.Wright has actually stayed usually soundless because a High Court ruling was actually issued claiming that he had actually existed "substantially and also repeatedly" in his proof trying to show the claim that he was bitcoin's inventor, Satoshi Nakamoto.Wright tried in the London litigation to prove he was actually the original maker of bitcoin, and therefore held trademark civil rights, including possession of copyright in the bitcoin white colored newspaper and initial variations of the bitcoin program. The bitcoin process is actually a decentralized, open-source network as well as no solitary facility can capture over it.Mellor concluded that Wright sought to produce a misleading story through forging files "on a marvelous scale," providing them as evidence in court.He included that through accelerating his claim to become Satoshi Nakamoto with action in the U.K. u00e2 $" and also Norway as well as the U.S. u00e2 $" Wright devoted "a most significant misuse" of the procedure of the courts.On Wright's main website, which was actually cleaned of web content not long after Mellor's ruling, a lawful notification was uploaded on Tuesday which read: "DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT IS NOT SATOSHI NAKAMOTO." This notice, which says again the ruling that Wright was not the innovator of bitcoin, takes note that Wright has actually been ordered certainly not to commence any sort of legal process based on his duplicitous claims u00e2 $" or even counterclaims u00e2 $" which he needs to certainly not intimidate any kind of such proceedings.Wright's supporting company, Tulip Trading, was certainly not right away readily available for opinion when talked to through CNBC.